G.) The wedding regarding Draw MEEKS and you can Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)
The guy bought and you may increased here just what became his house towards next twenty two years as well as on this one all the pupils were produced except the two earliest. Within the 1891 he sold this house and you may purchased section thirty-two inside cut off ten in the four miles northeast of Chillicothe, that he improved and you will left since the a property-stead.
Sworn so you’re able to and licensed prior to me personally, that it 21st day of October
His Christian lifestyle prolonged owing to a period of more forty years. He stored solidly with the Primitive Baptist faith, hence became their entire consolation within his past weeks and by one another precepts and you will analogy he illustrated the greatest Gå över till den här webbplatsen form of an American citizen.
Draw MEEKS’ 2nd relationship, so you’re able to Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] was Sep 21, 1858 when you look at the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. There is nothing identified regarding a wedding so you can a COHEN except that the wedding license, filed during the Matrimony Book step one, page 914, suggestions the wedding since the ranging from elizabeth, and you can Sarah made their own mark. The marriage was did because of the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.
T. KERLEY
I, T. T. KERLEY, do solemnly swear that we in the morning 21 years old, and this Miss W. C. MEEKS try 18/7 years of age, hence there are no legal arguments to our Relationship. J. C. WELLS getting pledged claims that moms and dads off Miss W. C. MEEKS provides offered the complete agree to the wedding of its daughter so you can Mr. T.
Sarah and you may Mark lived west of Haynesville during the Claiborne Parish to possess a while along with most likely just one child, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the new wife away from T. All of the friends info imply that Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY came into this world November 29, 1865, at Vow, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, therefore the grave marker implies a night out together regarding beginning from 1865. I would suggest, yet not, the day out of delivery could have in reality become November 30, 1863 instead of you to definitely go out from inside the 1865. Without a doubt, there is no delivery certificate. The newest death certification is no let, because indicates a romantic date away from delivery away from November 29, 1886, more than 5 years adopting the big date from their particular marriage. It will mean an age at death of 52, and since the new death occurred January sixteen, 1919, she’d was in fact created in 1866, making the 1886 likely a great typographical mistake. Meant for various beginning big date, I have around three arguments:
- The fresh new census taker-in 1870, performing August 23, 1870, revealed that the fresh new infant’s ages try nine. When you’re census takers try notoriously bad from the many years, it is extremely strange, In my opinion, regarding young a baby having a delivery day you to far-away. It might just be three years completely wrong into fixed go out as opposed to 5 years wrong to your 1965 go out. Brand new 1880 census taker detailed the age while the 18, once more too old having possibly time and you can wrong just like the in advance of their unique matrimony, demonstrated less than, whenever she wasn’t yet 18.
- One particular really serious dispute You will find is the matrimony permit, duplicated verbatim into profile ?. There are two main change towards published means, the initial as being the requirement that the lady become at the very least to try to get years old versus adult concur, therefore the next getting the away-dated form was released for use into the very first around three digits of date getting “187”, that’s entered upon inform you a romantic date out of Oct 21, 1881. Having an effective November 29th birthday celebration and stay seventeen, the year out-of beginning need to be 1863. If the she was really ten in the place of throughout the 30 days shy from to try to get, carry out the brand new clerk enjoys accepted the expression of the groom’s cousin that bride’s parents acknowledged the marriage?